tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2327798346644458245.post9001374934252813723..comments2023-10-22T05:15:33.468-04:00Comments on 88 Topps Cards: #204 Paul O'NeillAndyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05644396308532248413noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2327798346644458245.post-83673966599994217832008-02-29T11:15:00.000-05:002008-02-29T11:15:00.000-05:005 Rings in a good productive career. If he played...5 Rings in a good productive career. If he played w/the yankees anytime between 1930 and 1960, he'd be in the hall.Lukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15521371257268577443noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2327798346644458245.post-2665429188496755312008-02-28T15:31:00.000-05:002008-02-28T15:31:00.000-05:00unrelated to Paul O'Oneill, but why are the ads do...unrelated to Paul O'Oneill, but why are the ads down?Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17911546348926892846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2327798346644458245.post-29407452371059081492008-02-28T14:00:00.000-05:002008-02-28T14:00:00.000-05:00The tale of two Paul's. You have Cinncy Paul and N...The tale of two Paul's. You have Cinncy Paul and NY Paul. He blossomed more as a Yankee and received more recognition during those championship teams. I thought he was decent with the Reds but, stayed more under the radar while Larkin and Davis were the "stars" of the team.Extra Inningshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14697162728891264949noreply@blogger.com